Each Monday I try to maintain a series on this blog called "Digging Deeper." The purpose of these posts will be to "dig deeper" into the text that I preached the previous Sunday. It is almost always the case that there is more that could be said on every text that I preach at Riverview, and sometimes time constraints don't allow me to say everything that could be said about a particular text we are studying together. Invariably, some things get left on the cutting room floor. For this reason I thought it might be helpful to pick up some of those scraps on Monday and try to learn from them.
In the first book of the Bible, Genesis 12.1-3 kicks off the story of a rescue mission that is initiated by God himself. Through Abraham and his descendants, God promised to send One who would repair the breech created by man's willful sin against God and thereby bless "all the families of the earth." God's rescue mission would be an all-encompassing, world-wide mission. God would send his Son into the world to live a perfect life, die a perfect death, and then defeat death through his resurrection.
And then, in the last book of the Bible, Revelation 7.9-10 shows us a future time which has not yet come to pass, in which people from "every nation, from all tribes and peoples and languages" are "standing before the throne and before the Lamb, clothed in white robes, with palm branches in their hands, and crying out with a loud voice, 'Salvation belongs to our God who sits on the throne, and to the Lamb!'" Clearly, God's world-wide rescue mission is destined for success.
Although the Bible tells us that God's world-wide rescue mission is indeed destined to be successful, it is not yet complete. We have not yet reached the Revelation 7 reality of people from every corner of the earth worshipping the Lamb because there are people of the earth who are still yet unreached. In his wisdom, God has chosen people to be the vehicle by which this blessing to the nations and all the families of the earth would be spread. God doesn't just snap his fingers and cause all people of the world to come to him for salvation. He could, but he doesn't. Instead, he uses his people to bring the blessing of Christ to the nations. A tremendous blessing has been give to the nations, and God calls each one of us to be his ambassadors and to bring that good news to all the families of the earth.
The question is, what are you doing to be a part of God's world-wide rescue mission?
John Piper has famously said, "There are only three kinds of Christians: those who send, those who go, and those who are disobedient." God has called you to be either a goer or a sender - or both.
Those Who Send
At Riverview, we value the work of international missions and missionaries - people who have dedicated their lives to going to other lands to bring the gospel of Jesus Christ to all the families of the earth so that they might hear and be blessed. So we partner with several missions organizations and missionaries to do this work. Just last week, Bible translators Steve and Carol Jean Gallagher reported that they recently celebrated the five year anniversary of the translation of the scriptures into the Bariai language of the people of Papua New Guinea. Before their translation work, God's word did not exist in their language. As recently as last week, Steve and Carol Jean ran out of Bibles to give to people who requested them. God has a plan to bless the Bariai people, and it is our privilege to partner with Steve and Carol Jean to bring this blessing to them. Our part in God's blessing of the nations has been realized by sending people - from our own church - to the nations to declare the good news of Jesus Christ. In fact, Riverview has been privileged to send out several missionaries from our doors overseas, even to places where Christ has never been named.
Those Who Go
But the work of God is not limited to international missions. There are many here in our own nation who do not know God, who are still at odds with him, and who need to be blessed through the gospel. Every eight weeks a team of faithful people from Riverview travel to the Dakota County Jail to minister to the inmates there. The gospel is declared faithfully and clearly, as our own people go to be ambassadors of Jesus even in our own community. To be one who goes, you don't necessarily need to go overseas. You simply need to go across the street.
This is the call of every follower of Jesus: to send others to the nations by equipping and resourcing them for the task ahead, and to go into our own communities - our own families, even - to preach the good news of the gospel. God has a desire to bless the people living in the deepest, darkest jungles where Christ has never been named, and he also wants to bless the people in your social sphere, living in 21st century modern America. And he has called you to bring his blessing to the nations, across your street, into your community, into your workplace, into your school, and into your family. This is what Christians do. They act as agents of God right where they are, and by extension through sending others in their stead.
Those Who Are Disobedient
This is God's mission, but he has called us to be a part of it. To not participate is to be disobedient. Your job is to figure out how you will be obedient to partner with God in his world-wide rescue mission. Maybe you can't go overseas, but you can send others with your resources. Or maybe you can't go overseas, but you can go across the street.
Which Kind Are You?
As we come upon the Christmas season, we remember the most significant part of God's rescue mission: the sending of his Son into the world to save sinners. As you reflect on that marvelous miracle, reflect also on how God is calling you to be a part of what he is doing in the world.
Monday, November 27, 2017
Monday, November 13, 2017
Digging Deeper: The Toilet Bowl of the Bible
Each Monday I try to maintain a series on this blog called "Digging Deeper." The purpose of these posts will be to "dig deeper" into the text that I preached the previous Sunday. It is almost always the case that there is more that could be said on every text that I preach at Riverview, and sometimes time constraints don't allow me to say everything that could be said about a particular text we are studying together. Invariably, some things get left on the cutting room floor. For this reason I thought it might be helpful to pick up some of those scraps on Monday and try to learn from them.
Some commentators have described Judges 19 as the "toilet bowl of the Bible." While that may seem to you to be a rather crass description, it is accurate in the sense that the events described therein are utterly disgusting and vile: gang rape, murder, and mutilation are only the tip of the iceberg of depravity described in Judges 19.
So then, why is it in the Bible at all? As you can probably guess, many critics of the Bible believe that Judges 19 essentially disqualifies the entire Bible from believability. Why does God allow these horrible actions to transpire? Does he approve of this? Why didn't he stop it? Why should we believe and follow him if he allows something like this to happen? How are we to understand Judges 19 and the brutality it describes?
Over the years there have been several attempts to answer these questions and to either justify God or the characters in the story. This has been particularly evident in more modern biblical scholarship, as some have interpreted this text from a feminist point of view, and also from a pro-homosexual viewpoint. For instance, the feminist readings of Judges 19 have focused on the plight of the women in the story, and condemned the patriarchal society in which the events unfolded (and by implication and even explicit statement, God himself). Homosexual readings of Judges 19 have determined that the primary sin of the men of Gibeah was not homosexuality, per se, but was instead a lack of hospitality towards strangers. Each of these readings, however, force modern (and subjective and personal) sensibilities onto the text. Instead, as interpreters, it is our job to remove as much of ourselves as possible when we interpret the text, and let it speak for itself. We should not feel it necessary to attempt to justify God or anyone else as we read the Bible, and we should be very hesitant to force our own personal, cultural, or societal sensibilities onto the text - even when our sensibilities are righteous and good.
One of the most important things we need to remember when reading scripture - and especially hard parts like Judges 19 - is the genre of the literature we are reading. The book of Judges is an historical narrative, and so the author of the book writes as a dutiful historian: just the facts, with very little - if any - personal commentary. This is particularly true of the book of Judges. Throughout its pages, you will find very few moral judgments made by the author. That is, the author very rarely ever pauses to interject his own feelings about the morality of a given scenario. For instance, when Samson marries a Philistine woman, the author does not say that it was the wrong thing to do - even though it was. Later, when Samson visits a prostitute, he is not condemned by the author - even though he could have been. The reason for this is that the author's primary purpose is to relay historical facts, and not necessarily to comment on the morality of a given situation. We know, however, that the morality of the book of Judges is in the gutter because we know God. We allow our knowledge of scripture and the character and nature of God interpret the events of the book of Judges. Not what we think is right or wrong, but what God thinks is right and wrong.
This is also true of Judges 19, and more generally, of Judges 17-21. These chapters are filled with historical events of a dubious moral nature and, for the most part, the author remains silent about the morality of the events he describes. For instance, there are only two moral judgments made by the author (that I can find, at least). First, he calls the men of the town of Gibeah "worthless fellows." Second, he says that the moral and spiritual climate of Israel at the time was one that could be characterized by the reality that "there was no king in Israel..." Both earlier and later in this book, the moral and spiritual climate of Israel is more succinctly described as "everyone did what was right in their own eyes." Aside from these somewhat abstract moral judgments, the author's main purpose is to record and communicate historical facts. Most moral judgments that we make regarding the events described in this book come from outside of the actual text. And as we've seen, we need to be careful about forcing our own sensibilities onto the text.
Since the author is writing an historical account, we also need to remember that neither the human author - nor the spiritual author - necessarily condone what is being described. We often make the mistake of thinking that God approves of the history that is recorded in the Bible. In many cases, he does not. Although the events are recorded for us to read, that doesn't mean that God approves of what unfolded. We also should remember that just because the Bible records historical events, that doesn't mean that we should seek to duplicate or recreate those historical events. History is history - not a direct command for us to obey. Think of reading a history text book when you were in high school: you didn't interpret your history text book as being a direct command for your to follow or an event for you to recreate for yourself. History describes things that have happened in the past - it doesn't prescribe things that should happen in the present or future. The same is true of the Bible: it records history, and sometimes that history is brutal, unforgiving, and even barbaric.
Then how should we read difficult texts like Judges 19? We should read it for what it is: an historical narrative about a group of people at the depths of their depravity, doing wicked, vile, and evil things. And we can make those judgments because we the rest of the testimony of scripture: we know that the character and nature of God is contrary to the events described in Judges 19. God did not approve of it, nor desire for it to happen.
But also, we know from the rest of scripture that even though mankind is at his most depraved in Judges 19, he has not moved so far away from God as to be unredeemable. Yes, the events of this chapter are horrific and demand our condemnation and swift justice and punishment. Indeed, God will see that justice is done for the nameless concubine who is horrifically raped, murdered, and mutilated. Justice will be served for those responsible, either through an eternity of punishment in hell, or through the substitutionary atonement of Jesus Christ. Judges 19 is a picture of just how sinful we all truly are. No, you may have never committed acts like those described in this chapter, but you certainly have fallen - and far - from God's grace, perhaps through murder of the heart by hating your brothers, or perhaps through sexually violating someone in the secret thoughts of your heart and mind. Nevertheless, you are not too far away to be redeemed. The scandal of grace - and the message of the book of Judges - is that God can even redeem rapists and murderers - even you.
Some commentators have described Judges 19 as the "toilet bowl of the Bible." While that may seem to you to be a rather crass description, it is accurate in the sense that the events described therein are utterly disgusting and vile: gang rape, murder, and mutilation are only the tip of the iceberg of depravity described in Judges 19.
So then, why is it in the Bible at all? As you can probably guess, many critics of the Bible believe that Judges 19 essentially disqualifies the entire Bible from believability. Why does God allow these horrible actions to transpire? Does he approve of this? Why didn't he stop it? Why should we believe and follow him if he allows something like this to happen? How are we to understand Judges 19 and the brutality it describes?
Over the years there have been several attempts to answer these questions and to either justify God or the characters in the story. This has been particularly evident in more modern biblical scholarship, as some have interpreted this text from a feminist point of view, and also from a pro-homosexual viewpoint. For instance, the feminist readings of Judges 19 have focused on the plight of the women in the story, and condemned the patriarchal society in which the events unfolded (and by implication and even explicit statement, God himself). Homosexual readings of Judges 19 have determined that the primary sin of the men of Gibeah was not homosexuality, per se, but was instead a lack of hospitality towards strangers. Each of these readings, however, force modern (and subjective and personal) sensibilities onto the text. Instead, as interpreters, it is our job to remove as much of ourselves as possible when we interpret the text, and let it speak for itself. We should not feel it necessary to attempt to justify God or anyone else as we read the Bible, and we should be very hesitant to force our own personal, cultural, or societal sensibilities onto the text - even when our sensibilities are righteous and good.
One of the most important things we need to remember when reading scripture - and especially hard parts like Judges 19 - is the genre of the literature we are reading. The book of Judges is an historical narrative, and so the author of the book writes as a dutiful historian: just the facts, with very little - if any - personal commentary. This is particularly true of the book of Judges. Throughout its pages, you will find very few moral judgments made by the author. That is, the author very rarely ever pauses to interject his own feelings about the morality of a given scenario. For instance, when Samson marries a Philistine woman, the author does not say that it was the wrong thing to do - even though it was. Later, when Samson visits a prostitute, he is not condemned by the author - even though he could have been. The reason for this is that the author's primary purpose is to relay historical facts, and not necessarily to comment on the morality of a given situation. We know, however, that the morality of the book of Judges is in the gutter because we know God. We allow our knowledge of scripture and the character and nature of God interpret the events of the book of Judges. Not what we think is right or wrong, but what God thinks is right and wrong.
This is also true of Judges 19, and more generally, of Judges 17-21. These chapters are filled with historical events of a dubious moral nature and, for the most part, the author remains silent about the morality of the events he describes. For instance, there are only two moral judgments made by the author (that I can find, at least). First, he calls the men of the town of Gibeah "worthless fellows." Second, he says that the moral and spiritual climate of Israel at the time was one that could be characterized by the reality that "there was no king in Israel..." Both earlier and later in this book, the moral and spiritual climate of Israel is more succinctly described as "everyone did what was right in their own eyes." Aside from these somewhat abstract moral judgments, the author's main purpose is to record and communicate historical facts. Most moral judgments that we make regarding the events described in this book come from outside of the actual text. And as we've seen, we need to be careful about forcing our own sensibilities onto the text.
Since the author is writing an historical account, we also need to remember that neither the human author - nor the spiritual author - necessarily condone what is being described. We often make the mistake of thinking that God approves of the history that is recorded in the Bible. In many cases, he does not. Although the events are recorded for us to read, that doesn't mean that God approves of what unfolded. We also should remember that just because the Bible records historical events, that doesn't mean that we should seek to duplicate or recreate those historical events. History is history - not a direct command for us to obey. Think of reading a history text book when you were in high school: you didn't interpret your history text book as being a direct command for your to follow or an event for you to recreate for yourself. History describes things that have happened in the past - it doesn't prescribe things that should happen in the present or future. The same is true of the Bible: it records history, and sometimes that history is brutal, unforgiving, and even barbaric.
Then how should we read difficult texts like Judges 19? We should read it for what it is: an historical narrative about a group of people at the depths of their depravity, doing wicked, vile, and evil things. And we can make those judgments because we the rest of the testimony of scripture: we know that the character and nature of God is contrary to the events described in Judges 19. God did not approve of it, nor desire for it to happen.
But also, we know from the rest of scripture that even though mankind is at his most depraved in Judges 19, he has not moved so far away from God as to be unredeemable. Yes, the events of this chapter are horrific and demand our condemnation and swift justice and punishment. Indeed, God will see that justice is done for the nameless concubine who is horrifically raped, murdered, and mutilated. Justice will be served for those responsible, either through an eternity of punishment in hell, or through the substitutionary atonement of Jesus Christ. Judges 19 is a picture of just how sinful we all truly are. No, you may have never committed acts like those described in this chapter, but you certainly have fallen - and far - from God's grace, perhaps through murder of the heart by hating your brothers, or perhaps through sexually violating someone in the secret thoughts of your heart and mind. Nevertheless, you are not too far away to be redeemed. The scandal of grace - and the message of the book of Judges - is that God can even redeem rapists and murderers - even you.
Labels:
Digging Deeper,
Hermeneutics,
Scripture,
Sermons,
The Bible
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)